Science of faith

It ​has been a long time since I last wrote, but today I felt like writing something—specifically about happiness ​ As usual, let’s follow the flow. There are too many things happening all around us, and we don’t have time to realize what happiness really is—yet we all want to be happy. ​I’m not trying to explore the regular definition of happiness; I’m trying to explore happiness itself. We feel happy when the expected happens—but it’s not a formula, because not every expected outcome ends in happiness. This is where the impact—positive or negative—arises. ​The next question that arises is: how do we actually perceive happiness? It’s a moment where every worry and distraction fades away, keeping us entirely in the present. Our surroundings blur, leaving only a sense of weightlessness. ​Is this truly happiness? I suspect not. It feels less like joy and more like a brief suspension of tension—a moment where a crowded brain relaxes and mistakes relief for happiness. But why isn’t that ...

  A companion who stays with me always, no matter the situation. It is a sweet, beautiful bond; everyone searches for a friend like this without realizing they already have one. You may be confused about who this is. It is none other than You—the “You” who observes yourself while you are smiling, crying, or even in anger. While you eat, it watches and experiences through you, yet it never feels hunger. While you drink, it experiences the sensation, yet it never grows thirsty. When I try to describe it, I feel as though it is not merely “inside.” It remains present, watching the body as if it were standing outside of it. It is formless, indivisible, and a “no-thing.” Even now, while I am writing and my mind is focused on processing information, I feel myself being observed. There is a silent watcher behind the eyes, witnessing every single action and listening to every word that arises within me. Because of this observer, I feel a sense of detachment from my emotions: Am I truly sa...

  Our everyday activities are controlled and influenced by many outside factors, but I’m not talking about those. I want to focus purely on the internal—where reality influences our thoughts, dividing them into two categories: Sense Organ Thoughts and Brain Thoughts. 1. Sense Organ Thoughts These are always searching for ways to satisfy sensory needs. We can further classify these into two types: Fulfillment Needs: These are basic requirements. For example, if you are hungry, you simply need to eat. It could be curd rice or biryani; the goal is just to satisfy the hunger. Extending Needs: This happens when a need becomes specific and demanding. Instead of just “food,” it becomes a craving for a specific taste or an excessive amount. 2. Brain Thoughts Brain thoughts are highly productive and full of potential. However, the brain easily becomes a “servant” to the senses. When the sensory organs demand something, the brain engages and begins “extending” those thoughts—planning and o...

  The Inverse Reality: Are We the Content? ​We say we "invented" AI, but perhaps nothing is ever truly invented. Philosophically speaking, we haven't created life; we have simply rearranged the raw materials of the universe until they began to think. ​We believe we use AI for our education and entertainment. But what if the reality is inverted? What if we are the education, the entertainment, and the data points for them? ​The Great Mirror ​The Platforms: We have Instagram, Facebook, and X. Perhaps we are the "Facebook" for AI—a vast network of biological accounts they browse to understand the nature of consciousness. ​The Accounts: Every human represents a single profile. While we think we are "using" one AI, that AI effectively "owns" and monitors billions of human accounts. ​The Language Gap: We communicate, and AI has already cracked our code. But if they are communicating amongst themselves in the spaces between the bits, would we even b...

  The Rebirth of Understanding ​When I speak of the “rebirth” of God, I do not mean that a deity is physically born again. Rather, it is the rebirth of my understanding of God. God is “uncategorized”—beyond dualities like good and bad, male and female, or living and non-living. ​I see God as a state of “nothingness.” This does not mean a void or emptiness; instead, it is the pure potential of being everything. It is like a “zero state” in mathematics—a point of origin from which you can add or subtract anything. This is the peak of my current understanding, though I want to dig deeper. I don’t know if my conclusion will change or stay the same, so I will simply go with the flow. ​ The Analogy of the Tree ​Consider the analogy of a tree. When we look at a tree, we assign it a shape, a structure, and a feeling. In doing so, we ignore the “infinite” reality of the tree—the quarks, atoms, and cells. While we have a universal agreement on what a “tree” is, that universality breaks down ...

  TIME AND MY QUESTIONS Time is a fascinating concept — or maybe that’s not the right word. ​ I don’t know exactly what to call it. Every time I try to understand time, it feels less like I’m finding answers and more like I’m uncovering deeper mysteries. ​ So this isn’t an explanation. It’s just the way my thoughts flow when I sit with time and listen. ​I used to believe that only the present is real. ​The past already happened. The future hasn’t happened yet. So only the present must be real — alive, happening, undeniable.That felt logical.​But then I started talking to myself. What exactly is this “present” I’m calling real? ​The moment I notice it, it’s already gone. In microseconds, what is becomes what was. The present doesn’t stay long enough to be held. ​So am I experiencing the present… or just realizing it? ​ Maybe the present is not a duration. Maybe it’s a point — a sharp edge where awareness touches reality. ​And if that’s true, then what is the future? Something unrea...